While the concept of gender double standards is widely understood, the term gender triple standards refers to the multifaceted ways in which individuals are judged not only based on their gender but also on additional intersecting factors like race, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status. These triple standards impose complex and often contradictory expectations, especially on women and gender-diverse individuals from marginalised groups.

Keywords: Triple standards, Intersectionality and gender, Gender inequality, Race and class discrimination, Mental health and triple standards, Intersectionality in education, Societal impacts of triple standards, Workplace inequality and triple standards

Gender triple standards occur when societal expectations differ based on a combination of factors, creating even more rigid and unfair standards for certain groups. For example, women of colour may face stricter expectations of behaviour compared to white women, with the same behaviours interpreted differently based on racial or cultural contexts (Crenshaw, 1991). Additionally, queer or non-binary individuals may be judged for failing to conform to either masculine or feminine standards, further complicating the social dynamics they navigate.

In the workplace, women and men are often held to different standards, but when intersecting factors like race and class are introduced, the disparities widen. For instance, women of colour may face higher scrutiny in leadership roles, while men from marginalised communities may experience heightened expectations to conform to dominant standards of masculinity. Research shows that women of colour often face a “double bind” of needing to prove competence while also being expected to conform to traditional gender roles of nurturing and passivity (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008).

The concept of intersectionality, introduced by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw (1991), highlights how different forms of discrimination overlap. In relationships, triple standards manifest when individuals are judged not only on their gender but also on cultural or racial backgrounds. For example, women from certain cultural backgrounds may be expected to adhere to traditional roles within relationships, while others may face criticism for being too progressive or assertive. These varying expectations can create tension and pressure, further marginalising individuals from non-dominant cultures.

In media, gender triple standards are evident in how different groups are portrayed. Women of colour are often stereotyped in specific ways, such as being seen as “exotic” or overly aggressive, while white women may be more likely to be portrayed as delicate or feminine (Hooks, 1992). Similarly, men of different races face different expectations regarding masculinity. For example, black men may be stereotyped as hyper-masculine or violent, while Asian men may be viewed as passive or less masculine (Wong et al., 2013). These media portrayals perpetuate harmful stereotypes and create layered expectations that vary based on both gender and race.

The stress caused by trying to navigate these triple standards can have significant consequences on mental health. Individuals who feel they cannot meet societal expectations based on their gender, race, or sexual orientation are more likely to experience anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem. For example, studies have shown that queer people of colour face heightened rates of mental health challenges due to the intersection of racism and homophobia (Meyer, 2003). The weight of these compounded expectations can make it difficult for individuals to maintain their well-being and feel a sense of belonging in society.

Challenging gender triple standards requires recognising the multiple factors that shape an individual’s experience. Intersectionality is key to understanding how race, gender, class, and sexual orientation interact. Advocacy efforts should focus on promoting gender equality while also addressing the unique challenges faced by marginalised groups. This can be achieved by improving representation in media, promoting workplace diversity, and supporting mental health resources that take an intersectional approach to well-being.

Gender triple standards highlight the complex and multi-layered forms of inequality that individuals face based on their gender, race, and other intersecting identities. These triple standards are more than just double standards amplified—they create unique challenges that require nuanced understanding and action. By addressing these issues, society can move closer to achieving true gender equality and supporting the mental and emotional health of all individuals.

• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
• Hooks, B. (1992). Black Looks: Race and Representation. South End Press.
• Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674-697.
• Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5-6), 377-391.
• Wong, Y. J., Ho, M. R., Wang, S. Y., & Miller, I. S. (2013). Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(1), 80-93.

How to get in touch

If you or your NDIS participant need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.