Success is a multifaceted concept that can be defined in various ways, depending on individual goals, societal standards, and cultural contexts. While success often involves financial achievement or professional recognition, it can also encompass personal satisfaction, meaningful relationships, and contributions to the community. One factor that plays a crucial role in determining success is personality. Different personality traits and types can influence how individuals approach challenges, interact with others, and pursue their goals. This article explores the personality types that are most successful, drawing on scientific research to highlight the traits and behaviours that contribute to success in various domains of life.

Keywords: personality types, success, Big Five personality traits, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, leadership, emotional intelligence, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, personality psychology

Personality refers to the characteristic patterns of thinking, feeling, and behaving that differentiate individuals from one another. It is shaped by a combination of genetic, environmental, and situational factors. Two of the most widely used frameworks for understanding personality are the Big Five personality traits and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI).

The Big Five personality traits, also known as the Five-Factor Model (FFM), is a widely accepted framework in psychology for describing personality. It consists of five broad dimensions:

• Openness to Experience: The degree to which a person is imaginative, curious, and open to new ideas.
• Conscientiousness: The extent to which a person is organised, dependable, and goal-oriented.
• Extraversion: The level of sociability, assertiveness, and enthusiasm a person displays.
• Agreeableness: The degree to which a person is cooperative, compassionate, and friendly.
• Neuroticism: The tendency to experience negative emotions, such as anxiety, anger, and depression (John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008).

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is another popular personality framework that categorises individuals into 16 distinct personality types based on four dichotomies:

• Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I): Focus on the external world versus the internal world.
• Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N): Preference for concrete information versus abstract concepts.
• Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F): Decision-making based on logic versus emotions.
• Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P): Preference for structure and order versus flexibility and spontaneity (Myers, 1995).

While the MBTI is widely used in corporate and educational settings, the Big Five is more commonly employed in academic research due to its strong empirical support.

Research has identified several key personality traits that are consistently associated with success in various domains, including career achievement, leadership, and personal well-being.

Among the Big Five personality traits, conscientiousness has been found to be the most reliable predictor of success across different fields. Conscientious individuals are typically organised, diligent, and goal-oriented. They are more likely to set and achieve long-term goals, exhibit self-discipline, and maintain a strong work ethic (Roberts, Jackson, Fayard, Edmonds, & Meints, 2009).

Conscientiousness is associated with positive outcomes such as academic achievement, job performance, and career advancement. In a meta-analysis by Judge, Higgins, Thoresen, and Barrick (1999), conscientiousness was found to be positively correlated with job performance and leadership effectiveness. Moreover, conscientious individuals are less likely to engage in risky behaviours, which contributes to their overall stability and success.

Emotional stability, the inverse of neuroticism, is another important trait linked to success. Individuals who are emotionally stable tend to remain calm under pressure, manage stress effectively, and recover quickly from setbacks. This resilience enables them to navigate the challenges of work and life without being overwhelmed by negative emotions (Judge, Heller, & Mount, 2002).

Emotional stability is particularly important in leadership roles, where the ability to maintain composure and make rational decisions under stress is critical. Research has shown that emotionally stable leaders are more effective at inspiring confidence in their teams and managing crises (Harms, Spain, & Hannah, 2011).

Extraversion is characterised by sociability, assertiveness, and enthusiasm. Extraverted individuals are often more successful in roles that require frequent interaction with others, such as sales, marketing, and management. Their ability to engage with people, build relationships, and assert themselves in social situations can lead to greater opportunities and career success (Barrick, Mount, & Judge, 2001).

Extraversion is also associated with leadership effectiveness. Extraverted leaders tend to be more charismatic, motivating, and capable of influencing others. However, the relationship between extraversion and leadership is complex, as successful leadership also requires other traits such as emotional intelligence and conscientiousness (Judge, Bono, Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002).

Openness to Experience refers to a person’s willingness to explore new ideas, embrace change, and engage in creative thinking. Individuals high in openness are often more successful in fields that require innovation, such as entrepreneurship, research, and the arts. Their curiosity and willingness to take risks can lead to breakthroughs and novel solutions to problems (McCrae & Costa, 1997).

In the workplace, open individuals are more likely to seek out new experiences, adapt to change, and drive innovation. This trait is particularly valuable in rapidly evolving industries where creativity and adaptability are key to success (Le Pine, Colquitt, & Erez, 2000).

Agreeableness is associated with traits such as kindness, empathy, and cooperation. While agreeableness is not as strongly linked to success as conscientiousness or extraversion, it plays a crucial role in building and maintaining positive relationships. Agreeable individuals are often successful in roles that require teamwork, collaboration, and customer service (Barrick et al., 2001).

In leadership, agreeableness can contribute to a supportive and inclusive environment. Leaders who are high in agreeableness are more likely to be approachable, empathetic, and concerned with the well-being of their team members. However, excessive agreeableness can sometimes be a disadvantage in competitive environments, where assertiveness and tough decision-making are required (Judge et al., 2002).

While the MBTI is less empirically supported than the Big Five, certain MBTI personality types are often associated with success in specific fields.

The ENTJ (Extraverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Judging) type is often referred to as “The Commander” and is frequently associated with leadership and success in business. ENTJs are known for their strategic thinking, assertiveness, and ability to make tough decisions. They thrive in environments that require vision, planning, and execution, making them well-suited for roles such as CEOs, managers, and entrepreneurs (Myers, 1995).

The INTJ (Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Judging) type, known as “The Architect,” is often successful in fields that require independent thinking, problem-solving, and strategic planning. INTJs are analytical, driven by logic, and capable of long-term planning. They are often found in careers such as engineering, research, and academia, where their ability to think critically and innovate is highly valued (Myers, 1995).

The ENTP (Extraverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Perceiving) type, known as “The Debater,” is characterised by creativity, innovation, and a love of challenges. ENTPs are often successful in dynamic environments that require quick thinking and adaptability, such as entrepreneurship, marketing, and law. Their ability to see multiple perspectives and come up with creative solutions makes them valuable in roles that require negotiation and strategic thinking (Myers, 1995).

In addition to personality traits and types, emotional intelligence (EI) is increasingly recognised as a critical factor in achieving success. Emotional intelligence refers to the ability to recognise, understand, and manage one’s own emotions, as well as the emotions of others. High EI is associated with better interpersonal relationships, effective communication, and strong leadership skills (Goleman, 1995).

Research has shown that emotional intelligence can predict success in various domains, including leadership, teamwork, and customer service. Individuals with high EI are more likely to navigate social complexities, manage stress, and inspire others, all of which contribute to their overall success (Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2008).

Success is influenced by a combination of personality traits, emotional intelligence, and situational factors. While traits such as conscientiousness, emotional stability, and extraversion are consistently linked to success, it is important to recognise that different personality types can excel in different environments. The key to success lies in understanding one’s own strengths and weaknesses, leveraging those strengths, and continuously developing skills such as emotional intelligence.

By recognising and nurturing the traits that contribute to success, individuals can achieve their goals and find fulfilment in both their personal and professional lives.

• Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 9-30.
• Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101.
• Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91-119.
• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
• Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
• Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 495-509.
• John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114-158). Guilford Press.
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780.
• Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652.
• Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 530-541.
• Le Pine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563-593.
• Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist, 63(6), 503-517.
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). Academic Press.
• Myers, I. B. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Davies-Black Publishing.
• Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.
• Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369-381). Guilford Press.

How to get in touch

If you or your NDIS participant need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.