Shaming is a powerful psychological and social mechanism used to enforce societal norms, often by publicly humiliating or criticising individuals for their behaviour, appearance, or beliefs. Shaming can occur in various forms, including online shaming, body shaming, or parental shaming, and is often used to control or modify behaviour. However, the psychological effects of shaming can be long-lasting, leading to emotional distress, anxiety, and even depression. This article explores the different types of shaming, their effects, and the cultural context in which they occur.
Keywords: Shaming, Online shaming, Body shaming, Psychological impact of shame, Social comparison and shaming, Toxic shame, Self-compassion and mental health, Emotional abuse and shaming
The Psychology Behind Shaming
At its core, shaming taps into a person’s sense of self-worth and social belonging. According to social comparison theory, people often evaluate themselves based on how they compare to others, particularly in social contexts (Festinger 1954). Shaming exploits this comparison by highlighting perceived flaws or failures, often making individuals feel inferior or ostracised. When individuals are shamed, they may internalise these negative evaluations, which can lead to feelings of worthlessness and isolation.
Brene Brown, a prominent researcher on shame, describes shame as the intensely painful feeling or experience of believing that we are flawed and therefore unworthy of love and belonging (Brown 2006). Unlike guilt, which focuses on behaviour (“I did something bad”), shame targets the self (“I am bad”), making it a powerful and harmful emotion.
Types of Shaming
Shaming manifests in various forms, each with unique consequences:
1. Body Shaming
Body shaming refers to the criticism or mockery of someone’s physical appearance, often based on societal beauty standards. Social media and popular culture have contributed to the rise of body shaming, particularly targeting those who do not fit conventional standards of beauty (Puhl & Heuer 2009). The psychological effects of body shaming include decreased self-esteem, body dysmorphia, and eating disorders such as anorexia and bulimia (Fairburn & Harrison 2003).
2. Online Shaming
The internet has amplified the scope of shaming through online shaming, where individuals are publicly criticised or humiliated on social media platforms. Online shaming can take the form of call-out culture, where people are “called out” for perceived wrongdoings or offensive statements. While call-outs can promote accountability, they often escalate into harassment, cyberbullying, and emotional abuse (Solove 2007). Victims of online shaming frequently report experiencing anxiety, depression, and in extreme cases, suicidal ideation.
3. Parental Shaming
Parental shaming occurs when parents use humiliation or embarrassment to discipline or control their children. Publicly criticising or belittling children, whether in person or online, can have detrimental effects on their self-worth and mental health. Research has shown that children who experience parental shaming are more likely to develop anxiety, depression, and issues with emotional regulation in adulthood (Hoffman 2000).
Cultural and Social Contexts of Shaming
Shaming is deeply ingrained in many cultures, often used as a tool to enforce societal norms. In collectivist cultures, where community and social harmony are prioritised, shaming can serve as a means of maintaining social order (Triandis 1995). Individuals who deviate from cultural norms or bring “dishonour” to their families may be publicly shamed to encourage conformity.
In contrast, in individualistic cultures, personal autonomy is more valued, yet shaming still plays a role in regulating behaviour. Online shaming, particularly in Western societies, has emerged as a form of social justice, where individuals are held accountable for offensive or harmful behaviour. However, the boundary between accountability and cruelty is often blurred, leading to unintended emotional harm for those targeted (Solove 2007).
The Psychological Effects of Shaming
The psychological toll of shaming can be profound. Research indicates that individuals who are subjected to shame are more likely to experience mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem (Tangney & Dearing 2002). Shame is also linked to social isolation, as individuals may withdraw from relationships to avoid further humiliation or rejection.
In extreme cases, chronic shaming can lead to toxic shame, a deeply ingrained sense of unworthiness that can affect all aspects of a person’s life (Bradshaw 1988). Toxic shame is often associated with trauma, and individuals may turn to unhealthy coping mechanisms, such as substance abuse or self-harm, to numb the emotional pain.
The Role of Compassion in Addressing Shame
While shaming is often used as a tool for behavioural correction, research shows that compassion and empathy are far more effective in promoting positive change. Studies on self-compassion, a concept championed by psychologist Kristin Neff, suggest that treating oneself with kindness and understanding can reduce feelings of shame and improve mental health outcomes (Neff 2011). By fostering a culture of compassion, individuals and communities can support personal growth and accountability without resorting to shaming tactics.
Conclusion
Shaming, in all its forms, has far-reaching psychological and social consequences. Whether experienced online, through body criticism, or in parental relationships, the effects of shame can damage self-worth, mental health, and social connections. Understanding the negative impacts of shaming and promoting compassion and empathy as alternatives are essential steps in creating healthier, more supportive social environments. Instead of using shame as a means of control or discipline, societies should encourage constructive communication and self-compassion.
References
- Bradshaw, J 1988, Healing the Shame That Binds You, Health Communications, Deerfield Beach, FL.
- Brown, B 2006, Shame Resilience Theory: A Grounded Theory Study on Women and Shame, University of Houston, Houston, TX.
- Fairburn, CG & Harrison, PJ 2003, ‘Eating disorders’, The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9355, pp. 407–416.
- Festinger, L 1954, ‘A theory of social comparison processes’, Human Relations, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–140.
- Hoffman, ML 2000, Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Neff, KD 2011, Self-Compassion: The Proven Power of Being Kind to Yourself, HarperCollins, New York.
- Puhl, RM & Heuer, CA 2009, ‘The stigma of obesity: A review and update’, Obesity, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 941–964.
- Solove, DJ 2007, The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
- Tangney, JP & Dearing, RL 2002, Shame and Guilt, Guilford Press, New York.
- Triandis, HC 1995, Individualism & Collectivism, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
How to get in touch
If you or your NDIS participant need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.





