The question of why terrorists commit heinous acts is complex and multifaceted. The recent attack on a Christian Orthodox Bishop, Mar Mari Emmanuel, during a live sermon has shaken up the Australian community By delving into the psychological, sociological, and individual factors that motivate terrorists, we can gain better insights into their actions and potentially find ways to prevent future attacks. This article explores the motivations and mental states of terrorists and why they would attack a religious leader in a public setting like the one at the Christ the Good Sheppard Church, integrating scientific research and expert analysis.

At the core of terrorist psychology is the concept of identity and belonging. Post (2005) suggests that many terrorists are driven by an identity that is defined in terms of perceived membership in a marginalized group. This sense of belonging is often reinforced by a network that shares extremist ideologies and mutual support (Silke, 2003). The process of radicalisation often involves the merging of personal and group identity, where individual grievances become synonymous with the group’s grievances, intensifying personal commitment to the group’s cause (Horgan, 2009).

Terrorists often emerge from societies and subcultures that have a history of conflict or perceived oppression. Moghaddam (2005) introduces the “Staircase to Terrorism” model, which describes a step-by-step process whereby individuals escalate their commitment to extremist actions. This model starts with a perceived unfairness or injustice and progresses through stages of displacement of aggression, identifying with terrorist ideologies, and solidifying one’s role within a terrorist group. This framework highlights the importance of cultural and social contexts in the formation of terrorist motivations.

Research into the mental states of terrorists has produced mixed findings. Some studies suggest that terrorists are no more likely to suffer from mental illness than the general population (Corner et al., 2019). However, there is evidence pointing to certain cognitive traits that are more prevalent among terrorists, such as “cognitive rigidity,” a lack of openness to experience, and a propensity towards simplistic black-and-white thinking (Saucier et al., 2009). These cognitive styles can make individuals more susceptible to extremist ideologies that frame complex social and political issues in stark, binary terms.

Ideology plays a crucial role in motivating terrorists. It provides a framework that justifies previously unthinkable actions and offers a narrative that glorifies the perpetrator as a hero fighting for a noble cause (Crenshaw, 1981). For example, religious extremism often involves an apocalyptic worldview where catastrophic events are seen as necessary to bring about a new, purified world (Stern, 2003). This “ends justify the means” mentality can be particularly persuasive for those who feel disenfranchised or hopeless.

Understanding the motivations and mental states of terrorists is key to developing effective prevention and intervention strategies. Strategies that focus on community engagement and counter-radicalisation, such as those implemented in Australia’s approach to countering violent extremism, are critical. These programs aim to intervene before individuals become fully radicalised and engage in educational and social initiatives to build resilience against extremist ideologies (Australian Government, 2015).

Religious leaders often symbolise broader ideologies or moral stances that stand in direct opposition to the beliefs held by terrorists. When terrorists target these figures, they aim not only to eliminate a perceived enemy but also to send a powerful message to followers and adversaries alike. Juergensmeyer (2000) notes that attacking a religious leader can be seen as striking at the heart of the community, undermining its morale and cohesion.

The decision to target religious leaders can be a calculated tactic in psychological warfare. This form of terrorism aims to instill fear, demoralisation, and chaos within a community. McCauley and Moskalenko (2008) describe how terrorists use acts of extreme violence to polarize societies, driving wedges between different religious or ethnic groups and fostering a climate of fear and suspicion.

From a psychological perspective, terrorism is often about asserting identity and differentiating the ingroup from the outgroup. Horgan (2005) explains that terrorists see themselves as defenders of an ingroup under threat, and by targeting religious leaders who represent outgroups, they reinforce their own group identity and solidarity. This us-versus-them mentality is crucial in maintaining group cohesion and justifying violence against those labeled as enemies.

The symbolic power of religious leaders can magnify the psychological impact of an attack. Atran (2003) discusses how religious symbolism can be exploited by terrorists to achieve a dramatic emotional response from both their supporters and their enemies. By attacking a religious leader, terrorists can provoke outrage, grief, and potentially retaliatory violence, which can further escalate conflict and serve their broader strategic goals.

The radicalisation process often involves adopting extremist ideologies that vilify certain religious groups. Borum (2011) suggests that radical beliefs are reinforced through a community or network that shares these views. In this context, religious leaders opposing these extremist views become prime targets. Attacking them can be seen as an act of ideological commitment, serving to solidify the terrorist’s standing within their community and further entrenching their radical views.

The motivations and mental states of terrorists are shaped by a complex interplay of psychological, sociological, and ideological factors. By understanding these influences, we can better address the roots of terrorism and develop more effective counter-terrorism strategies. Continued research and dialogue in this area are essential for effective prevention and intervention efforts. The psychological motivations behind targeting religious leaders in terrorist attacks are deeply rooted in symbolic, strategic, and identity-based factors. These leaders represent not just spiritual authority but also cultural and moral values that terrorists aim to challenge. Understanding these motivations is key to developing counter-terrorism strategies that protect religious figures and address the root causes of extremism.

• Australian Government (2015). Preventing Violent Extremism and Radicalisation in Australia. Retrieved from [URL].
• Corner, E., Gill, P., & Mason, O. (2019). Mental health disorders and the terrorist: A research note probing selection effects and disorder prevalence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 42(3), 228-248.
• Crenshaw, M. (1981). The causes of terrorism. Comparative Politics, 13(4), 379-399.
• Horgan, J. (2009). Walking away from terrorism. Routledge.
• Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: A psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161-169.
• Post, J. M. (2005). The psychological assessment of political leaders. University of Michigan Press.
• Saucier, G., Akers, L. G., Miller, S. S., Stankov, L., Knežević, G., & Šejić, N. (2009). Patterns of thinking in militant extremism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 256-271.
• Silke, A. (2003). Terrorists, victims and society: Psychological perspectives on terrorism and its consequences. Wiley.
• Stern, J. (2003). Terror in the name of God: Why religious militants kill. HarperCollins.
• Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science, 299(5612), 1534-1539.
• Borum, R. (2011). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 7-36.
• Horgan, J. (2005). The Psychology of Terrorism. Routledge.
• Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. University of California Press.
• McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2008). Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20(3), 415-433.

How to get in touch

If you or your patient/NDIS clients need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au