Therapy Near Me Mental Health Articles

Acceptance Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy that emphasises accepting what is out of one’s personal control, while committing to action that enriches one’s life. Developed within the context of Relational Frame Theory, ACT aims to help individuals live a values-driven life rather than a life dictated by the avoidance of pain. This article explores the principles, techniques, and efficacy of ACT, supported by scientific research.

ACT is grounded in six core processes, which together are aimed at developing psychological flexibility:

Cognitive defusion involves strategies to reduce the tendency to literalise thoughts, thereby reducing their impact and influence over behavior. This helps individuals to respond to thoughts in more flexible and adaptive ways (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 2012).

Acceptance in ACT refers to making room for painful feelings, sensations, and urges, instead of trying to suppress or ignore them. It’s about embracing life’s challenges without excessive defensive reactions (Hayes et al., 2004).

This principle is about being psychologically present: engaging fully with the here-and-now experience, with openness, interest, and receptiveness.

ACT encourages the development of a perspective-taking aspect of self known as “self-as-context”—the you that is constant and consistent regardless of how thoughts and emotions may change.

Identifying what is most meaningful in life — personal values are identified to guide, motivate, and inspire purposeful action that enhances life quality.

This process involves setting goals based on identified values and carrying out actions to achieve these goals, even in the face of setbacks and challenges.

ACT uses a variety of techniques to foster these six core processes, including metaphor, paradox, and mindfulness skills. These techniques help to increase psychological flexibility and have been applied successfully across a wide range of clinical conditions, including anxiety, depression, stress, and PTSD.

Numerous studies have investigated the effectiveness of ACT. A meta-analysis by Powers et al. (2009) concluded that ACT is particularly effective for the treatment of mental health disorders, comparing favorably with other treatments such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Additionally, ACT has been shown to help with chronic pain management, offering patients ways to cope with pain and reduce its impact on their lives (Veehof et al., 2011).

ACT has been successfully applied to a wide range of psychological disorders, including anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and substance abuse. Its flexibility and adaptability make it suitable for diverse populations with varying psychological needs (Hayes et al., 2006).

One of the distinguishing features of ACT is its emphasis on values and committed action. This approach helps clients not just to alleviate symptoms but to move towards a life that is meaningful according to their own values. This can increase motivation and engagement in therapy (Dahl et al., 2004).

ACT’s core aim is to increase psychological flexibility—the ability to contact the present moment fully and change or persist in behavior when doing so serves valued ends. This overarching skill is linked to improved well-being and better adjustment to changes and stressors in life (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).

ACT is an evidence-based therapy with strong empirical support for its efficacy in treating various disorders. Meta-analyses have shown that ACT can lead to significant improvements in psychological health, often matching or exceeding traditional treatments like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) (Powers et al., 2009).

ACT involves complex and sometimes abstract concepts such as cognitive defusion and self-as-context. These can be difficult for clients to grasp, particularly those who are accustomed to more direct problem-solving approaches used in other types of therapy (Crits-Christoph et al., 2010).

While ACT has been shown to be effective in the short term, there is less evidence regarding its long-term effects. More longitudinal studies are needed to establish the durability of its outcomes (Öst, 2014).

The effectiveness of ACT can depend significantly on the therapist’s understanding and mastery of its principles. Inconsistent application or misunderstanding of the core processes by practitioners can lead to less effective treatment outcomes (Bluett et al., 2014).

Although ACT is versatile, there are conditions for which its effectiveness might be limited compared to specialised treatments. For instance, disorders that have a strong biological component, such as certain types of schizophrenia, may require more than psychological flexibility to manage effectively (Hofmann & Asmundson, 2008).

Acceptance Commitment Therapy offers a unique approach to mental health treatment by promoting acceptance and mindfulness, combined with commitment and behavior change strategies. This model helps individuals to confront their psychological barriers and enhance their life through actions aligned with their values. As research continues, ACT is increasingly recognised as a viable and effective treatment option for a variety of psychological issues.

• Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2004). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25.
• Powers, M. B., Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, M. B., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2009). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78(2), 73-80.
• Veehof, M. M., Oskam, M. J., Schreurs, K. M. G., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2011). Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain, 152(3), 533-542.
• Bluett, E. J., Homan, K. J., Morrison, K. L., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2014). Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety and OCD spectrum disorders: An empirical review. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(6), 612-624.
• Crits-Christoph, P., Gibbons, M. B. C., & Mukherjee, D. (2010). Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In J. C. Norcross, G. R. VandenBos, & D. K. Freedheim (Eds.), History of psychotherapy: Continuity and change (pp. 298-332). APA.
• Dahl, J., Wilson, K. G., & Nilsson, A. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: A preliminary randomized trial. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 785-801.
• Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes, and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25.
• Hofmann, S. G., & Asmundson, G. J. (2008). Acceptance and mindfulness-based therapy: New wave or old hat? Clinical Psychology Review, 28(1), 1-16.
• Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865-878.
• Öst, L. G. (2014). The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 61, 105-121.
• Powers, M. B., Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, M. B., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2009). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78(2), 73-80.

How to get in touch

If you or your patient/NDIS clients need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.