Therapy Near Me Mental Health Articles

Cognitive dissonance is a fundamental concept in psychology that describes the mental discomfort experienced when an individual holds two or more contradictory beliefs, values, or attitudes simultaneously. This article explores the theory of cognitive dissonance, its implications, and how it influences human behaviour, supported by scientific research and expert analysis.

Cognitive dissonance was first introduced by psychologist Leon Festinger in 1957. According to Festinger, cognitive dissonance occurs when individuals encounter conflicting cognitions (thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes), leading to psychological discomfort. This discomfort motivates individuals to reduce the dissonance by altering their beliefs, attitudes, or behaviours to achieve consistency (Festinger, 1957).

1. Cognitions: These are the thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, or perceptions held by an individual.
2. Dissonance: This is the conflict or inconsistency between two or more cognitions.
3. Reduction: The process through which individuals attempt to resolve the dissonance to restore psychological harmony (Festinger, 1957).

Individuals employ various strategies to reduce cognitive dissonance:

One way to reduce dissonance is by changing existing beliefs or attitudes to align with new information. For example, if a person learns that smoking is harmful to health, they may quit smoking to align their behaviour with this new belief (Harmon-Jones & Mills, 2019).

People tend to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs and avoid information that contradicts them. This selective exposure helps to reduce dissonance by reinforcing consistent cognitions (Smith et al., 2008).

Another strategy is to trivialise the importance of the conflicting cognition. For instance, if someone enjoys eating unhealthy food but knows it’s bad for their health, they might downplay the health risks to reduce dissonance (Simon, Greenberg, & Brehm, 1995).

Adding new cognitions that justify or rationalise the conflicting beliefs can also help reduce dissonance. For example, a person who drives a gas-guzzling car might justify it by thinking they compensate by recycling and conserving energy at home (Thøgersen, 2004).

Cognitive dissonance plays a significant role in decision making. After making a difficult choice, individuals often experience post-decision dissonance, where they focus on the positive aspects of their choice and the negative aspects of the alternative to justify their decision (Brehm, 1956).

Understanding cognitive dissonance can be leveraged to promote behaviour change. For example, health campaigns that create dissonance by highlighting the risks of unhealthy behaviours can motivate individuals to adopt healthier lifestyles (Aronson, 1999).

Cognitive dissonance is also relevant in the context of moral and ethical behaviour. When individuals act in ways that conflict with their moral values, they experience dissonance and may either change their behaviour or rationalise their actions to reduce discomfort (Tsang, 2002).

Dissonance can lead to significant changes in attitudes. When individuals engage in behaviours that are inconsistent with their attitudes (e.g., advocating for a position they don’t initially support), they may change their attitudes to align with their behaviour to reduce dissonance (Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959).

Cognitive dissonance is frequently observed in consumer behaviour. After making a purchase, consumers may experience buyer’s remorse if they perceive the product as inconsistent with their expectations. To reduce dissonance, they may seek out positive reviews or additional justifications for their purchase (Cummings & Venkatesan, 1976).

In the political realm, cognitive dissonance can explain why individuals often remain loyal to their political beliefs despite conflicting evidence. By selectively exposing themselves to supportive information and dismissing contradictory evidence, they maintain cognitive consistency (Taber & Lodge, 2006).

Cognitive dissonance can also impact personal relationships. When someone’s actions contradict their beliefs about a relationship, they may either change their behaviour or alter their perceptions of the relationship to reduce dissonance (Draycott & Dabbs, 1998).

Cognitive dissonance is a powerful psychological concept that explains how individuals strive for consistency in their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours. By understanding the mechanisms of dissonance reduction and its implications, we can gain insights into various aspects of human behaviour, from decision making and behaviour change to consumer behaviour and political ideology. Recognising and addressing cognitive dissonance can lead to more informed choices and healthier, more consistent behaviours.

• Aronson, E. (1999). The Social Animal (8th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
• Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 52(3), 384-389.
• Cummings, W. H., & Venkatesan, M. (1976). Cognitive dissonance and consumer behavior: A review of the evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(3), 303-308.
• Draycott, S., & Dabbs, A. (1998). Cognitive dissonance: 20 years of research. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 923-926.
• Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203-210.
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (2019). Cognitive Dissonance: Reexamining a Pivotal Theory in Psychology (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Simon, L., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 247-260.
• Smith, E. R., Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. (2008). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 464-493.
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
• Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 93-103.
• Tsang, J. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25-50.
• Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

How to get in touch

If you or your patient/NDIS clients need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.