Stockholm syndrome is a psychological phenomenon where hostages or victims of abuse develop a bond with their captors or abusers, often showing empathy, loyalty, or affection. This condition was first identified after a bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden, in 1973, where hostages began sympathising with their captors despite the threat to their lives. This article delves into the psychological mechanisms behind Stockholm syndrome, its causes, and its implications for understanding human behaviour in abusive situations.

Keywords: Stockholm syndrome, Psychological effects of trauma, Captivity and emotional bonds, Hostage syndrome, Domestic violence and trauma, Stockholm syndrome in abuse, Cognitive dissonance and trauma, Emotional attachment to abusers, Power dynamics in trauma, Trauma bonding

The term “Stockholm syndrome” was coined following the 1973 bank heist at Kreditbanken in Stockholm, where hostages were held for six days by two armed robbers. During this time, the hostages began to exhibit trust and affection toward their captors and even resisted rescue efforts. Despite their life-threatening circumstances, the hostages developed emotional bonds with the perpetrators. This counterintuitive response baffled psychologists and sparked interest in understanding the psychological dynamics at play.

1. Survival Instinct and Cognitive Dissonance

At its core, Stockholm syndrome is seen as a survival strategy. Victims, in a situation where they are powerless, may unconsciously develop positive feelings towards their captors to reduce the perception of threat and increase the chance of survival (Graham 1994). These feelings can help victims cope with the overwhelming fear and helplessness they experience, creating an emotional connection as a psychological defence mechanism (Cantor & Price 2007).

Cognitive dissonance theory also helps explain this phenomenon. When a person’s thoughts and actions are in conflict (e.g., knowing the captor is a threat but also relying on them for survival), individuals may rationalise their captor’s behaviour to reduce mental discomfort (Festinger 1957). As a result, they might begin to view their captor more favourably.

Several conditions make Stockholm syndrome more likely to occur:

1. Isolation from Other Perspectives

When victims are isolated from the outside world and dependent on their captor for basic needs, such as food, water, or even emotional connection, they may start to identify with the perpetrator. The lack of external influence exacerbates the bond between victim and captor, as the victim has no other source of support or perspective (Namnyak et al. 2008).

2. Perceived Acts of Kindness

If the captor shows small acts of kindness, such as providing food or allowing the victim to live, the victim may interpret these actions as goodwill. Over time, this can lead to gratitude and a distorted perception of the captor’s motives, reinforcing the emotional bond (Cantor & Price 2007).

3. Length of Captivity

The longer an individual is held captive, the more likely Stockholm syndrome is to develop. Prolonged exposure to a captor creates a dynamic where victims feel dependent on their abuser for survival and protection, increasing the likelihood of emotional attachment (Graham 1994).

While Stockholm syndrome is most commonly associated with hostage situations, it can also manifest in other contexts, such as domestic abuse, child abuse, and human trafficking. In abusive relationships, victims may develop loyalty or affection for their abusers as a way to endure prolonged trauma. This emotional connection can prevent them from seeking help or leaving the abusive situation (Briere & Scott 2015).

Victims of domestic violence, for example, may stay in abusive relationships due to their attachment to the abuser, even when they are aware of the harm being done to them. The fear of leaving or the belief that the abuser “truly cares” for them can maintain the abusive cycle (Walker 2016).

Despite its widespread use, Stockholm syndrome is not an official diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), and some psychologists argue that it oversimplifies complex trauma reactions (American Psychiatric Association 2013). Critics suggest that the term can pathologise victims’ survival strategies and overlook the broader socio-cultural and structural factors that contribute to victimisation (Namnyak et al. 2008).

Additionally, the phenomenon has been criticised for its gendered implications, as it is often associated with female victims, leading to misunderstandings about how men and women respond to captivity or abuse (Booth 2010). Critics argue for more nuanced understandings of trauma responses, including the role of power dynamics and learned helplessness in abusive situations.

Stockholm syndrome is a fascinating, albeit controversial, psychological phenomenon that underscores the complex dynamics of power, fear, and attachment in extreme situations. Whether in hostage situations or abusive relationships, the emotional bonds that form between victims and their captors serve as coping mechanisms for survival. However, understanding Stockholm syndrome requires a broader perspective on trauma and the socio-cultural factors influencing victim behaviour. As we continue to explore these dynamics, it is crucial to approach the topic with compassion and a deeper understanding of the victim’s experience

• American Psychiatric Association 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), 5th edn, American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA.
• Booth, J 2010, Gendered experiences of trauma: Stockholming and domestic violence, Routledge, London.
• Briere, J & Scott, C 2015, Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment, Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
• Cantor, C & Price, J 2007, ‘Traumatic entrapment, appeasement and complex post-traumatic stress disorder: Evolutionary perspectives of hostage reactions, domestic abuse and the Stockholm syndrome’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 377–384.
• Festinger, L 1957, A theory of cognitive dissonance, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
• Graham, DL 1994, Loving to survive: Sexual terror, men’s violence, and women’s lives, New York University Press, New York.
• Namnyak, M et al. 2008, ‘Stockholm syndrome: Psychiatric diagnosis or urban myth?’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 4–11.
• Walker, LE 2016, The battered woman syndrome, 4th edn, Springer Publishing, New York.

How to get in touch

If you or your NDIS participant need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.