Recognising authentic versus inauthentic behaviour can be a valuable skill in personal and professional relationships. While phony or insincere people may present themselves as genuine, there are subtle signs that can reveal a lack of authenticity. Psychologists have long studied interpersonal behaviour, identifying certain traits and behavioural cues that can indicate when someone is not being truthful or sincere. This article explores the psychology behind inauthentic behaviour and offers insights on spotting phony people, including recognising behavioural inconsistencies, understanding the role of body language, and identifying signs of manipulation.
Keywords: How to spot a phony person, Signs of a phony person, Detecting inauthentic behaviour, Phony vs genuine personality traits, Psychologist’s advice on phony people, Recognising fake people, Inauthentic behaviour signs, Identifying insincere people
1. Inconsistent Behaviour and Words
One of the most prominent indicators of inauthenticity is inconsistency between what a person says and what they actually do. This inconsistency can be a red flag, as authentic individuals generally strive to align their actions with their words (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). When someone frequently contradicts themselves or fails to follow through on commitments, it may suggest they are not genuine in their intentions.
Inauthentic individuals may also shift their opinions based on who they are around or what they think others want to hear. Research in psychology shows that people who frequently alter their viewpoints to align with different groups often lack a firm sense of self, a trait that can come across as phony or superficial (Swann et al., 1987).
Tip: Pay attention to whether someone’s words match their actions over time. Consistent behaviour is often a strong indicator of authenticity.
2. Exaggerated or Overly Flattering Behaviour
Phony individuals often use flattery or exaggerated praise as a tool to gain favour or manipulate others. While compliments are a normal part of social interactions, inauthentic people may use excessive or insincere flattery to create a false sense of connection or to achieve personal goals (Vohs et al., 2005). This behaviour can often feel forced, as it lacks genuine warmth.
Over-the-top compliments and insincere praise can be a way for phony individuals to gain trust quickly, but they often lack substance. Authentic people, on the other hand, typically give praise that is specific, genuine, and balanced.
Tip: Be cautious of individuals who frequently give excessive, broad, or unspecific compliments. Genuine praise is usually specific and feels sincere.
3. Body Language and Nonverbal Cues
Nonverbal cues are often more revealing than spoken words, as they can expose hidden emotions or intentions. Psychologists suggest that body language can reveal authenticity, with genuine people displaying open and relaxed body language, while inauthentic people may show signs of discomfort or nervousness (Mehrabian, 1972). Common nonverbal signs of inauthenticity include forced smiles, lack of eye contact, or overly controlled gestures.
Micro-expressions, which are brief, involuntary facial expressions, can also be telling. These fleeting expressions can reveal true emotions, even if a person is attempting to mask them. A mismatch between someone’s facial expression and verbal tone can indicate insincerity, as the individual may be trying to conceal their true feelings.
Tip: Pay attention to subtle nonverbal cues like facial expressions, posture, and eye contact. Inconsistent or forced body language can suggest inauthenticity.
4. Lack of Accountability
A phony person may avoid taking responsibility for their actions, often deflecting blame or making excuses when things go wrong. According to research, authentic individuals are more likely to acknowledge mistakes and show accountability, while inauthentic individuals tend to protect their image by shifting blame (Tangney et al., 1996).
This avoidance of responsibility can be a sign of low self-awareness and a desire to maintain a flawless image, both of which are characteristics of inauthentic behaviour. Genuine people, in contrast, recognise that growth comes from acknowledging mistakes and learning from them.
Tip: Observe how a person responds to mistakes or setbacks. Authentic people tend to take responsibility, while phony individuals may avoid accountability.
5. Overemphasis on Popularity or Status
Phony individuals often seek validation from others and may be highly focused on popularity or social status. Research in social psychology suggests that those with an external locus of identity—where self-worth is based on others’ approval—are more likely to exhibit phony behaviours to gain acceptance (Deci & Ryan, 1985). These individuals might go out of their way to name-drop, flaunt connections, or emphasise material achievements.
Authentic people, on the other hand, derive self-worth from internal values and are less likely to be overly concerned with how others perceive them. They are comfortable with who they are, regardless of external validation, and do not rely on superficial means to establish self-worth.
Tip: Be cautious of individuals who appear overly concerned with status, popularity, or external validation, as this can be a sign of inauthenticity.
6. Frequent Use of Manipulative Tactics
Inauthentic individuals may resort to manipulative tactics to achieve their personal goals. Common manipulative behaviours include guilt-tripping, emotional blackmail, and passive-aggressive comments. These tactics are often subtle and are designed to make others feel responsible for the individual’s emotions or actions (Simon, 1996).
Manipulative behaviour can be a key indicator of inauthenticity, as phony people may use these tactics to maintain control over others. Psychologists suggest that authentic individuals value open communication and are more likely to express their needs honestly, rather than resorting to manipulation.
Tip: Notice if someone frequently uses guilt or passive aggression in interactions. Genuine people are typically straightforward in their communication.
7. Inability to Maintain Deep, Meaningful Relationships
Authentic people tend to cultivate meaningful relationships based on trust, openness, and mutual respect. Phony individuals, however, may struggle to form deep connections, as their relationships are often superficial and based on convenience rather than genuine connection. Research indicates that people who are more concerned with self-presentation may have fewer meaningful social bonds (Leary, 1996).
This inability to maintain close relationships may result from a lack of emotional openness or an excessive focus on self-image. Authentic relationships require vulnerability and honesty, qualities that phony individuals may avoid.
Tip: Observe the depth of someone’s relationships. Individuals who form shallow, short-term connections may lack the authenticity necessary for deeper bonds.
8. Frequent Self-Centred Conversations
Phony individuals often have a tendency to steer conversations towards themselves or their achievements. They may frequently speak in a way that seeks attention, praise, or admiration. This self-centred behaviour can signal a need for external validation and a lack of genuine interest in others (John & Robins, 1994).
Authentic individuals, in contrast, engage in balanced conversations and demonstrate genuine curiosity about others. They listen actively, ask thoughtful questions, and make others feel valued. Phony individuals, however, may dominate conversations or redirect topics to focus on their own interests or accomplishments.
Tip: Pay attention to how often someone shifts conversations to themselves. Authentic people engage in balanced, two-way interactions.
Conclusion
Spotting a phony person involves looking beyond words to understand deeper patterns in behaviour, body language, and interpersonal interactions. By recognising signs of inauthenticity—such as inconsistency, excessive flattery, lack of accountability, and manipulative tactics—you can better assess the authenticity of those around you. Understanding these psychological cues allows you to make more informed choices about who to trust and connect with, ultimately fostering more genuine relationships. While everyone exhibits occasional insincerity, consistent patterns of phony behaviour can be a red flag for inauthenticity, guiding you in building connections that are honest and meaningful.
References
- Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), pp. 497-529.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
- John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), pp. 206-219.
- Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Westview Press.
- Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Aldine-Atherton.
- Simon, G. (1996). In Sheep’s Clothing: Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People. A.J. Christopher & Associates.
- Swann, W. B., Jr., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), pp. 857-869.
- Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Proneness to shame, proneness to guilt, and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(2), pp. 328-337.
- Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, N. J. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), pp. 632-657.
How to get in touch
If you or your NDIS participant need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au
