Therapy Near Me Mental Health Articles

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on 22 November 1963 remains one of the most significant—and traumatically resonant—events in modern history. From a psychological standpoint, the incident symbolised a profound cultural rupture, triggering widespread shock, grief, and a collective search for meaning (Ling & Blum 2016). More than half a century later, the aftershocks of the event endure, kept alive by conspiracy theories, ongoing debates, and the powerful hold of collective memory (Bugliosi 2007). In this article, we examine the JFK assassination through a psychologist’s lens, exploring its impact on the public psyche, the nature of conspiracy beliefs, and the long-term effects of such high-profile trauma on a national consciousness.

Keywords: JFK assassination, Psychological impact, Collective trauma, Conspiracy theories, Lee Harvey Oswald motives, National grief, Mass media influence, Collective bereavement, Public tragedy, Warren Commission

In the immediate wake of Kennedy’s death, millions of Americans—and observers worldwide—experienced a profound sense of shock. Public rituals such as the funeral procession and television broadcasts helped many people externalise their grief (Ling & Blum 2016). Researchers have noted that sudden, violent losses of national figures can create forms of “collective bereavement,” where individuals who never met the figure still report deep sorrow and emotional distress (Curti 2020).

Kennedy’s assassination occurred in an era heavily shaped by emerging mass media. Televised news coverage of the event and subsequent investigations amplified the emotional resonance (Doss 2014). Psychologists suggest that when a tragedy is shared in real time by a large population, it can give rise to a “collective trauma,” influencing not just individual emotional states but also shifting cultural attitudes and political climates (Alexander 2012).

Conspiracy theories proliferated almost immediately following the assassination, driven by perceived inconsistencies or unanswered questions in official accounts such as the Warren Commission Report (Warren Commission 1964). From a psychological standpoint, the tendency to embrace conspiracy narratives can be explained by several cognitive mechanisms:

• Pattern Recognition: Humans have a strong drive to identify patterns, especially after traumatic events. The quest for a more intricate explanation than “a lone gunman” can soothe anxiety by imposing order on a chaotic reality (van Prooijen & Douglas 2017).
• Proportionality Bias: People often assume that a monumental event requires an equally monumental cause (Douglas et al. 2019). The idea of a vast conspiracy feels more commensurate with the gravity of the assassination than the actions of a single individual.

The JFK assassination happened at a time when trust in government institutions was relatively high, but it contributed to a shift in public sentiment (Ling & Blum 2016). Research on institutional distrust shows that high-profile controversies—like the debates over the “magic bullet” theory—can foster long-term scepticism, compounding the psychological need to look beyond official narratives (Goertzel 1994).

Social identity theory posits that individuals seek affirmation and belonging by affiliating with groups that share their beliefs (Tajfel & Turner 1979). In the context of JFK conspiracy theories, the groups advocating specific narratives—such as the CIA’s involvement or the Mafia’s role—can offer a sense of community and collective identity. This group reinforcement can strengthen belief in conspiratorial explanations, even in the face of conflicting evidence (Douglas et al. 2019).

Although Lee Harvey Oswald was identified by the Warren Commission (1964) as the lone assassin, debates over his motives and potential accomplices persist. While no definitive psychological assessment of Oswald exists—given his murder by Jack Ruby two days after Kennedy’s death—several factors might have intersected:

• Social Alienation: Oswald’s history of defection to the Soviet Union and difficulties with employment suggest a pattern of seeking belonging or validation (Marrs 2013).
• Identity and Recognition: Some researchers argue that individuals who perpetrate political violence may seek to leave their mark on history, driven by narcissistic needs or perceived injustices (Post 1998).
• Limited Data: The brevity of Oswald’s life post-assassination means in-depth psychological profiling remains speculative, relying on interviews, diaries, and second-hand accounts (Warren Commission 1964).

Decades after the assassination, references to “Camelot” and the Kennedy mystique retain their cultural power (Doss 2014). Psychologists studying collective memory assert that society selectively remembers and narrates historical events to reinforce shared identities or ideals (Paez & Liu 2011). The JFK assassination thus functions as both a symbol of national loss and a testament to ongoing scepticism toward official power structures (Alexander 2012).

Anniversaries of the assassination or the release of new documents often rekindle public interest, acting as “triggers” that re-stimulate emotional and psychological responses (Curti 2020). This cyclical pattern can perpetuate conspiracy theories, as each new wave of speculation suggests that the “truth” remains elusive (Douglas et al. 2019).

The JFK assassination underlined the emerging role of television and radio as conduits for both information and collective emotional experience (Doss 2014). Today’s digital and social media landscape magnifies this effect, with viral content and online forums accelerating the spread of conspiracy narratives.

Psychologically, large-scale public tragedies highlight how individuals process grief collectively. Shared rituals—such as memorials—can offer emotional relief (Ling & Blum 2016). Mental health professionals often encourage open dialogue, community support, and factual clarity to mitigate the negative psychological outcomes of traumatic events (Curti 2020).

The pervasiveness of JFK-related conspiracy theories underscores the need for critical thinking skills in evaluating evidence and distinguishing credible sources from speculation (Douglas et al. 2019). Education in media literacy and critical analysis can empower individuals to form well-grounded conclusions about complex historical incidents.

The assassination of John F. Kennedy was not merely a political turning point; it was, and continues to be, a profound psychological event. The shock and grief it produced created a lasting imprint on national consciousness, influencing public trust in institutions, fuelling conspiracy theories, and shaping collective memory. A psychological exploration of the JFK assassination reveals how humans cope with tragedy, seek meaning in chaos, and sustain narratives—both factual and speculative—over generations. By examining these dynamics, we gain insights into broader patterns of how societies respond to high-profile trauma, and how conspiracy beliefs often take root when certainty and security are threatened.

• Alexander, J.C. 2012, Trauma: A Social Theory, Polity Press, Cambridge.
• Bugliosi, V. 2007, Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, W.W. Norton, New York.
• Curti, L. 2020, ‘Public Grief and Collective Mourning: Cultural Responses to High-Profile Violence’, Journal of Cultural Psychology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 213–229.
• Doss, E. 2014, Memorial Mania: Public Feeling in America, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Douglas, K.M., Sutton, R.M. & Cichocka, A. 2019, ‘The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 538–542.
• Goertzel, T. 1994, ‘Belief in Conspiracy Theories’, Political Psychology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 731–742.
• Ling, J. & Blum, L. 2016, Television and the Cultural Moment: How Media Shapes Political Tragedy, Media Perspectives Press, New York.
• Marrs, J. 2013, Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy, Basic Books, New York.
• Post, J.M. 1998, ‘Terrorist Psycho-Logic: Terrorist Behavior as a Product of Psychological Forces’, in W. Reich (ed.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 25–40.
• Paez, D. & Liu, J.H. 2011, ‘Collective Memory of Conflicts’, in D. Christie (ed.), Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken.
• Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. 1979, ‘An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict’, in W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, pp. 33–47.
• van Prooijen, J.W. & Douglas, K.M. 2017, ‘Conspiracy Theories as Part of History: The Role of Societal Crisis Situations’, Memory Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 323–333.
• Warren Commission 1964, Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Enjoyed Our Free Daily Mental Health Articles?
If you find value in our insights and resources, we’d love to hear from you! Please consider visiting our Google Business Profile nearest to your location and leaving a review. Your feedback not only helps us improve but also allows us to continue providing free, high-quality mental health articles to support your wellbeing every day. Thank you for your support!

Therapy Near Me Brisbane

Therapy Near Me Canberra

Therapy Near Me Melbourne

Therapy Near Me Adelaide

Therapy Near Me Sydney

Therapy Near MeParramatta

Therapy Near Me Southbank

How to get in touch

If you or your NDIS participant need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.