Therapy Near Me Mental Health Articles

The term “gold digger” is often used to describe individuals who form relationships primarily to gain financial benefits. This phenomenon, while sometimes portrayed humorously in popular culture, has significant psychological underpinnings. Understanding the motives, behaviours, and psychological profiles of so-called gold diggers can provide deeper insights into human relationships and social dynamics. This article explores the psychology of gold diggers, supported by scientific research, to provide a comprehensive understanding of this behaviour.

Keywords: psychology of gold diggers, financial motives in relationships, relationship dynamics, Australian psychology, social behaviour, materialism

Gold digging refers to the practice of pursuing relationships for financial gain. Individuals labelled as gold diggers are perceived to prioritise their partner’s wealth over emotional connection or compatibility (Wilson et al., 2018). This behaviour can be motivated by various psychological, social, and economic factors.

One of the primary psychological motives for gold digging is materialism—the value placed on acquiring and possessing material goods.

• Materialism: Research indicates that individuals with high materialistic values are more likely to prioritise financial gain in their relationships (Richins & Dawson, 1992). Materialism is often linked to the desire for social status and the belief that wealth can enhance one’s social standing (Roberts & Clement, 2007).

For some individuals, pursuing relationships with wealthy partners is driven by the need for economic security and stability.

• Financial Security: Economic instability or financial struggles can lead individuals to seek out partners who can provide financial support (Lamont, 2014). This motive is particularly relevant in contexts where economic opportunities are limited, and financial dependence becomes a survival strategy (Wilson et al., 2018).

Narcissistic personality traits can also play a role in gold digging behaviour. Narcissists often seek out relationships that reinforce their self-image and provide validation.

• Narcissism: Individuals with high levels of narcissism may pursue wealthy partners to enhance their own status and self-worth (Campbell et al., 2002). These relationships are often characterised by a focus on personal gain and external validation (Morf & Rhodewalt, 2001).

Traditional gender roles and societal expectations can influence gold digging behaviour. Historically, men have been expected to be providers, while women have been seen as dependents, a dynamic that can perpetuate gold digging behaviour.

• Gender Dynamics: Research suggests that women are more likely to seek financially stable partners due to social conditioning and expectations of financial dependence (Buss, 1989). However, this dynamic can also occur in reverse, with men seeking wealthy women (Gowdy & Hendrick, 1999).

Media representations of relationships often glamorise wealth and material success, reinforcing the notion that financial prosperity is a key component of a desirable relationship.

• Media Influence: Television shows, movies, and social media can shape individuals’ perceptions of relationships, leading them to prioritise financial gain over emotional connection (Shrum et al., 2005).

Attachment theory can provide insights into the behaviour of gold diggers. Insecure attachment styles, such as anxious or avoidant attachment, may drive individuals to seek financial security through relationships.

• Insecure Attachment: Individuals with insecure attachment styles may use relationships as a way to manage anxiety and uncertainty, prioritising financial stability over emotional intimacy (Hazan & Shaver, 1987).

Certain personality traits are associated with a higher likelihood of engaging in gold digging behaviour.

• Machiavellianism: This trait involves manipulation and exploitation of others for personal gain. Individuals with high levels of Machiavellianism may be more likely to pursue relationships for financial benefits (Jones & Paulhus, 2009).
• Extraversion: Extraverted individuals, who are often more socially engaged and outgoing, may be more inclined to seek relationships that offer social and financial rewards (Ashton & Lee, 2007).

Gold digging behaviour can have significant implications for the dynamics and outcomes of relationships.

Relationships driven by financial motives can suffer from a lack of trust and authenticity. Partners may question each other’s intentions, leading to insecurity and conflict.

• Trust Issues: When financial gain is a primary motive, it can be challenging to establish genuine trust and emotional connection (Rempel et al., 1985).

Financial dependence can create imbalanced power dynamics within relationships, potentially leading to control and exploitation.

• Power Imbalance: Partners who control financial resources may exert power over their dependent partners, affecting the relationship’s overall health and balance (Lamont, 2014).

Understanding and addressing gold digging behaviour requires a multifaceted approach that considers psychological, social, and economic factors.

Promoting financial independence and economic opportunities can reduce the need for individuals to seek financial security through relationships.

• Economic Empowerment: Providing education, job training, and financial literacy programs can help individuals achieve financial independence and reduce reliance on wealthy partners (Wilson et al., 2018).

Therapeutic interventions can help individuals develop healthier relationship patterns and address underlying psychological issues such as insecurity, narcissism, and materialism.

• Counselling and Therapy: Psychological support can aid individuals in understanding their motives and developing more balanced and fulfilling relationships (Morf & Rhodewalt, 2001).

The psychology of gold diggers is complex, involving a blend of psychological motives, social influences, and economic factors. By understanding these dynamics, it is possible to foster healthier relationship patterns and address the underlying issues that drive gold digging behaviour. Promoting financial independence, providing psychological support, and challenging societal norms around wealth and relationships can contribute to more authentic and balanced partnerships.

• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150-166.
• Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1-14.
• Campbell, W. K., Foster, C. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 340-354.
• Gowdy, R., & Hendrick, S. S. (1999). Gender differences in sexual attitudes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(2), 357-368.
• Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524.
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 93-108). The Guilford Press.
• Lamont, E. (2014). Negotiating courtship: Reconciling egalitarian ideals with traditional gender norms. Gender & Society, 28(2), 189-211.
• Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177-196.
• Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95-112.
• Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303-316.
• Roberts, J. A., & Clement, A. (2007). Materialism and satisfaction with overall quality of life and eight life domains. Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 79-92.
• Shrum, L. J., Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2005). Television’s cultivation of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 473-479.
• Wilson, S. M., Hudson, K. D., & Wang, Q. (2018). Materialism and financial behaviors: Exploring the moderating effects of spouse’s materialism and gender. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 29(1), 133-144.

How to get in touch

If you or your patient/NDIS clients need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.