“Toxic femininity” is a term used to describe restrictive or damaging expressions of womanhood that can negatively impact individuals and communities. While much attention has rightly been given to understanding toxic masculinity, acknowledging the harmful manifestations of femininity is also important for fostering healthier, more equitable social environments (Bordo, 1993). This article examines the concept of toxic femininity, its psychological and social implications, and strategies for mitigating the harms associated with rigid gender norms.
Keywords: Toxic femininity, Harmful gender norms, Feminine stereotypes, Passive-aggressive behaviour, Relational aggression, Internalised sexism, Unrealistic beauty standards, Self-sacrifice and martyrdom
1. Defining Toxic Femininity
Where toxic masculinity often emphasises aggression, emotional suppression, and dominance, toxic femininity involves the ways in which narrow ideas about what it means to “be a woman” can lead to manipulative, passive-aggressive, or self-limiting behaviours (Bates, 2016).
Key features typically include:
- Excessive Concern with Appearance and Pleasing Others: Women may be socialised to prioritise external validation and uphold unrealistic standards of beauty or compliance (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997).
- Relational Aggression: Indirect or covert forms of hostility—such as gossip, social exclusion, or passive-aggressive communication—used to maintain social status (Crick and Grotpeter, 1995).
- Self-Sacrifice and Martyrdom: A tendency to neglect one’s own needs or desires in an attempt to appear nurturing or “good,” which can lead to resentment or burnout (Williams and Mickelson, 2008).
- Internalised Sexism: Holding onto or reinforcing stereotypes about women’s roles and capabilities, thereby perpetuating patriarchal norms (Szymanski et al., 2009).
It is crucial to note that “femininity” itself is not inherently harmful. However, certain cultural expectations can become “toxic” when they discourage healthy emotional expression, self-autonomy, or authentic connection.
2. Psychological and Social Implications
Much like toxic masculinity, toxic femininity can adversely affect mental health, relationships, and broader social structures:
Emotional Distress and Self-Esteem
- When women feel pressured to constantly appear “perfect” or agreeable, they may experience higher rates of stress, anxiety, and body image concerns (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997).
- The fear of conflict or disapproval can lead to bottled-up emotions and diminished self-worth, potentially worsening mental health (APA, 2007).
Relational Conflicts
- Toxic feminine norms sometimes endorse subtler methods of exerting social power, such as spreading rumours or forming cliques. These behaviours can damage friendships, professional relationships, and social cohesion (Crick and Grotpeter, 1995).
- Indirect aggression can mask deep-seated hostility, making conflict resolution more challenging.
Perpetuation of Gender Inequality
- Internalised sexism occurs when women reinforce negative stereotypes about their own gender. This can manifest as undermining other women’s achievements or expecting them to fulfil subservient roles (Szymanski et al., 2009).
- Such patterns sustain a culture in which women may be discouraged from seeking leadership roles or pursuing personal ambitions.
Stigmatisation of Vulnerability
- Toxic femininity can elevate an image of unwavering composure, caretaking, or niceness, discouraging women from expressing anger, ambition, or assertiveness (Bates, 2016).
- This can lead to self-silencing and increased susceptibility to depression or anxiety (Williams and Mickelson, 2008).
3. Toxic Femininity in the Australian Context
Australian culture, like many others, has its own historical and social narratives surrounding femininity. While positive traits such as community-mindedness and resilience are highly valued, there can be unspoken pressures for women to:
- Balance “Matey” and “Ladylike” Behaviour: Women may feel compelled to be sociable and fun, yet also traditionally demure, creating conflicting role demands.
- Uphold Beauty Standards: Public figures and media may reinforce an idealised, slim, and youthful image, contributing to body dissatisfaction (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997).
- Navigate the “Tall Poppy Syndrome”: Successful women may be subject to social backlash or gossip, limiting their willingness to stand out or celebrate achievements (Peeters, 2004).
Understanding how these cultural nuances play out in workplaces, social circles, and family systems can help identify and address toxic aspects of femininity in everyday Australian life.
4. Challenging Harmful Norms
Confronting toxic femininity involves tackling the societal and personal beliefs that sustain these harmful norms. Strategies include:
Encouraging Direct Communication
- Fostering open dialogue can discourage passive-aggressive or manipulative approaches to conflict.
- Building assertiveness skills helps women advocate for themselves and others without resorting to indirect aggression (Williams and Mickelson, 2008).
Promoting Authentic Self-Expression
- Encouraging a full range of emotional and behavioural expressions—beyond merely “sweet” or “nurturing”—validates women’s multifaceted identities (Bates, 2016).
- Normalising anger, ambition, and competitiveness in women can help dismantle stereotypes that women must always be compliant.
Addressing Internalised Sexism
- Awareness campaigns and educational programs can help identify ingrained stereotypes.
- Mentorship and supportive networks encourage women to uplift one another, reducing competition based on outdated gender expectations (Szymanski et al., 2009).
Advocating for Body Positivity and Mental Health
- Emphasising health and well-being over narrow beauty standards can alleviate pressures around appearance (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997).
- Accessible mental health resources—such as therapy, counselling, or support groups—can provide safe spaces to unpack the emotional burdens of toxic femininity.
Institutional and Structural Change
- Workplaces can offer training that addresses bias, fosters respect, and promotes equal representation in leadership roles (APA, 2007).
- Legal frameworks and organisational policies should protect against harassment, discrimination, and other manifestations of toxic gender expectations.
5. Moving Towards Healthier Forms of Femininity
The goal is not to reject femininity but rather to question and evolve restrictive norms. Healthier femininity allows for:
- Emotional Range: Women can express vulnerability, assertiveness, and everything in between without fear of judgment.
- Collaborative Support: Women can celebrate each other’s successes and assist in collective growth rather than competing or undermining one another.
- Personal Agency: Each individual is free to define how they engage with traditionally “feminine” traits—like empathy or caretaking—and integrate them with broader facets of identity.
- Constructive Communication: By embracing direct and honest dialogues, communities can foster greater trust and a more inclusive culture for people of all genders.
Conclusion
Toxic femininity highlights how narrow or damaging expressions of womanhood can undermine both individual well-being and social harmony. By addressing relational aggression, challenging internalised sexism, and promoting healthier models of womanhood, it becomes possible to cultivate environments in which all people can thrive.
References
- American Psychological Association (APA) (2007) Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Girls and Women. Washington, DC: APA.
- Bates, L. (2016) Girl Up. London: Simon & Schuster.
- Bordo, S. (1993) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Crick, N.R. and Grotpeter, J.K. (1995) ‘Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment’, Child Development, 66(3), pp. 710–722.
- Fredrickson, B.L. and Roberts, T.-A. (1997) ‘Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), pp. 173–206.
- Peeters, B. (2004) ‘Tall poppies and egalitarianism in Australian discourse: from key word to cultural value’, English World-Wide, 25(1), pp. 1–25.
- Szymanski, D.M., Gupta, A., Carr, E.R. and Stewart, D.N. (2009) ‘Internalized Misogyny as a Moderator of the Link between Sexist Events and Women’s Psychological Distress’, Sex Roles, 61(1–2), pp. 101–109.
- Williams, S.L. and Mickelson, K.D. (2008) ‘The Perpetuation of Subtle Sexual Harassment Through Neutral Responses to Ambiguous Behavior’, Sex Roles, 58(3), pp. 505–517.
Enjoyed Our Free Daily Mental Health Articles?
If you find value in our insights and resources, we’d love to hear from you! Please consider visiting our Google Business Profile nearest to your location and leaving a review. Your feedback not only helps us improve but also allows us to continue providing free, high-quality mental health articles to support your wellbeing every day. Thank you for your support!
How to get in touch
If you or your NDIS participant need immediate mental healthcare assistance, feel free to get in contact with us on 1800 NEAR ME – admin@therapynearme.com.au.
